It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
I wrote a quick summary and critique of this plan of action:
I used a method which is a bit harsh but actually speeds up the process wonderfully: first I summarized a harsh critique of this plan, then more about the plan itself. Since I have trouble recognizing what's feasible and what's not, it's good to start reading something after I've read someone trying to find holes in it.
For example: without reading the critique, would I have noticed that it's odd how they claim the carbon footprint of nuclear power is 25 times that of solar or wind? Maybe. Would I have ever noticed how they calculated this? I don't think so!
The nuclear advocates try to rip the solar-wind-hydro advocates to pieces, and vice versa. Playing them off against each other, we may learn something.