Home › Azimuth Project › › Azimuth Blog

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

- All Categories 2.4K
- Chat 505
- Study Groups 21
- Petri Nets 9
- Epidemiology 4
- Leaf Modeling 2
- Review Sections 9
- MIT 2020: Programming with Categories 51
- MIT 2020: Lectures 20
- MIT 2020: Exercises 25
- Baez ACT 2019: Online Course 339
- Baez ACT 2019: Lectures 79
- Baez ACT 2019: Exercises 149
- Baez ACT 2019: Chat 50
- UCR ACT Seminar 4
- General 75
- Azimuth Code Project 111
- Statistical methods 4
- Drafts 10
- Math Syntax Demos 15
- Wiki - Latest Changes 3
- Strategy 113
- Azimuth Project 1.1K
- - Spam 1
- News and Information 148
- Azimuth Blog 149
- - Conventions and Policies 21
- - Questions 43
- Azimuth Wiki 719

Options

This is a very rough draft of a short blog article.

The purpose is to inform developers, and scientists, about the Azimuth Code Project, and recruit some participation in our next round of activity, which needs to begin with writing specification for our next programs to be written. It would be great if we can get some specialists to help us out with this. But we can also do this on our own, by digging through the textbooks, discussing our findings amongst ourselves, and asking questions about the science as they come up.

My concrete hope is that the article will lead to some new people signing up for the forum, and chiming in.

## Comments

Looks good! As a reminder of where I am coming from: I do mathematical modeling of evolutionary processes.

I didn't like the bit about biology having a range of systems of varying complexity. I know what you mean but it does not represent what mathematical biologists do most of the time. We have have to make a series of models of varying complexity just to deal with a single bacterium. Likewise the whole of evolution. It's just like climate science in that respect. (And isn't the Moon's climate a simple model for the Earth's climate?)

I

didlikeOne of my frustations with working with biologists is that they do not understand probability theory well. (As a pedantic note, I regard stochastic processes as part of probability theory, not soemthing separate. Maybe say 'probability theory, especially stochastic processes'). And I also think that many failures of communications between scientists (very much including climate scientists) and the public are due to a lack of understanding by the public of the language of probability theory. Educating the general public is at a lower level then educating biologists, and probably requires different methods, different software. But really, anything along these lines would be good.

`Looks good! As a reminder of where I am coming from: I do mathematical modeling of evolutionary processes. I didn't like the bit about biology having a range of systems of varying complexity. I know what you mean but it does not represent what mathematical biologists do most of the time. We have have to make a series of models of varying complexity just to deal with a single bacterium. Likewise the whole of evolution. It's just like climate science in that respect. (And isn't the Moon's climate a simple model for the Earth's climate?) I *did* like > There is, for example, a lot of probability theory and stochastic processes that underlie the modelling of reality, and so software to educate about these concepts is also part of the Azimuth Code Project. One of my frustations with working with biologists is that they do not understand probability theory well. (As a pedantic note, I regard stochastic processes as part of probability theory, not soemthing separate. Maybe say 'probability theory, especially stochastic processes'). And I also think that many failures of communications between scientists (very much including climate scientists) and the public are due to a lack of understanding by the public of the language of probability theory. Educating the general public is at a lower level then educating biologists, and probably requires different methods, different software. But really, anything along these lines would be good.`