It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

- All Categories 2.2K
- Applied Category Theory Course 355
- Applied Category Theory Seminar 4
- Exercises 149
- Discussion Groups 49
- How to Use MathJax 15
- Chat 480
- Azimuth Code Project 108
- News and Information 145
- Azimuth Blog 149
- Azimuth Forum 29
- Azimuth Project 189
- - Strategy 108
- - Conventions and Policies 21
- - Questions 43
- Azimuth Wiki 711
- - Latest Changes 701
- - - Action 14
- - - Biodiversity 8
- - - Books 2
- - - Carbon 9
- - - Computational methods 38
- - - Climate 53
- - - Earth science 23
- - - Ecology 43
- - - Energy 29
- - - Experiments 30
- - - Geoengineering 0
- - - Mathematical methods 69
- - - Meta 9
- - - Methodology 16
- - - Natural resources 7
- - - Oceans 4
- - - Organizations 34
- - - People 6
- - - Publishing 4
- - - Reports 3
- - - Software 21
- - - Statistical methods 2
- - - Sustainability 4
- - - Things to do 2
- - - Visualisation 1
- General 39

Options

I've accepted an invitation to speak at the next winter meeting of the Canadian Mathematical Society, in Montreal. It's a public lecture at the start of the meeting, so I hope there will be a big crowd. It's on the evening of 4 December 2015.

I think this could be a good chance to improve the public lecture I gave in Sheffield for a meeting of the British Mathematical Society:

- The mathematics of planet Earth, 25 March 2013.

(That's when I met David Tweed and Jim Stuttard!)

People enjoyed that lecture - but I think it's important to get more specific about how mathematicians can help make the Anthropocene a better place.

Suggestions?

The basic format of presenting the scary reality and then proposing things to do about it seems okay.

hello world×