It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

- All Categories 2.4K
- Chat 502
- Study Groups 21
- Petri Nets 9
- Epidemiology 4
- Leaf Modeling 2
- Review Sections 9
- MIT 2020: Programming with Categories 51
- MIT 2020: Lectures 20
- MIT 2020: Exercises 25
- Baez ACT 2019: Online Course 339
- Baez ACT 2019: Lectures 79
- Baez ACT 2019: Exercises 149
- Baez ACT 2019: Chat 50
- UCR ACT Seminar 4
- General 75
- Azimuth Code Project 110
- Statistical methods 4
- Drafts 10
- Math Syntax Demos 15
- Wiki - Latest Changes 3
- Strategy 113
- Azimuth Project 1.1K
- - Spam 1
- News and Information 148
- Azimuth Blog 149
- - Conventions and Policies 21
- - Questions 43
- Azimuth Wiki 718

Options

For \( \textbf{Free}(G) \) to really be a category, we must check that this data we specified obeys the unitality and associativity properties. Check that these obeyed.

Definition 3.2. To specify a \( \textit{category C} \):

(i) one specifies a collection \( Ob(\textit{C}) \), elements of which are called \( \textit{objects} \).

(ii) for every two objects \( c, d \), one specifies a set \( C(c, d) \), elements of which are called \( \textit{morphisms} \) from \(c\) to \(d\).

(iii) for every object \( c \in Ob(C) \), one specifies a morphism \( id_c \in C(c, c) \), called the \( \textit{identity morphism} \) on \(c\).

(iv) for every three objects \( c, d, e \in Ob(C) \) and morphisms \( f \in C(c, d) \) and \( g \in C(d, e) \), one specifies a morphism \( f.g \in C(c, e) \), called the composite of \(f\) and \(g\).

It is convenient to denote elements \( f \in C(c, d) \) as \( f : c \rightarrow d \). Here, \(c\) is called the \(\textit{domain}\) of \(f\), and \(d\) is called the \(\textit{codomain}\) of \(f\).

These constituents are required to satisfy two conditions:

(a) **unitality**: for any morphism \( f : c \rightarrow d \), composing with the identities at \(c\) or \(d\)
does nothing: \( id_c . f = f \text{ and } f . id_d = f \).

(b) **associativity**: for any three morphisms \( f : c_0 \rightarrow c_1 , g : c_1 \rightarrow c_2 , \text{ and } h : c_2 \rightarrow c_3 \), the following are then equal: \( ( f . g) . h = f . (g . h ) \). We can write it simply as \(f.g.h\).

## Comments

According to the text leading up to exercise 8 (in Seven Sketches), \(\textrm{Ob}(\textbf{Free}(G))=V\), and the morphisms are paths (i.e., possibly infinite lists of arrows \(a,b,c\ldots{}\in A\) such that \(t(a)=s(b)\), \(t(b)=s(c)\ldots\)), including paths of length zero, i.e., identity arrows. Where \(V\) is the set of vertices of the graph, \(A\) is the set of arrows (directed edges, including loops from a vertex to itself), and \(s,t:A\to V\) are the source and target maps.

a) Composing an arrow \(f:c\to d\) with the identity on either side yields a path of the same length, one, containing equivalent arrows in the same order. Since paths are lists of arrows with matching sources and targets, where identity arrows can be omitted, \(\mathrm{id}_d\circ f\), \(f\), and \(f\circ\mathrm{id}_c\) all yield the same/equivalent path(s), and so the morphisms are equal.

b) Since paths, i.e., lists of arrows, are associative (i.e., \((ab)c=a(bc)\)), morphisms are also. This is because morphisms are equivalence classes of paths, where paths with or without identity arrows are considered equivalent (and one makes only this identification), and associativity of paths is respected by this equivalence (e.g., \((h\circ g)\circ (f\circ \mathrm{id}_{c_0})\) \(=(h\circ g)\circ f=h\circ (g\circ f)\) yields the same thing as \((h\circ g)\circ (f\circ \mathrm{id}_{ c_0})\) \(=h\circ (g\circ(f\circ\mathrm{id}_{c_0}))\) \(=h\circ (g\circ f\)).

Edit: This can be seen as a consequence of the commutativity of a certain diagram corresponding to the equation: \(\alpha\circ\sim=\sim\circ\alpha\), where \(\alpha\) serves to switch the position of parentheses and \(\sim\) identifies paths differing only by identity arrows.

`According to the text leading up to exercise 8 (in Seven Sketches), \\(\textrm{Ob}(\textbf{Free}(G))=V\\), and the morphisms are paths (i.e., possibly infinite lists of arrows \\(a,b,c\ldots{}\in A\\) such that \\(t(a)=s(b)\\), \\(t(b)=s(c)\ldots\\)), including paths of length zero, i.e., identity arrows. Where \\(V\\) is the set of vertices of the graph, \\(A\\) is the set of arrows (directed edges, including loops from a vertex to itself), and \\(s,t:A\to V\\) are the source and target maps. a) Composing an arrow \\(f:c\to d\\) with the identity on either side yields a path of the same length, one, containing equivalent arrows in the same order. Since paths are lists of arrows with matching sources and targets, where identity arrows can be omitted, \\(\mathrm{id}_d\circ f\\), \\(f\\), and \\(f\circ\mathrm{id}_c\\) all yield the same/equivalent path(s), and so the morphisms are equal. b) Since paths, i.e., lists of arrows, are associative (i.e., \\((ab)c=a(bc)\\)), morphisms are also. This is because morphisms are equivalence classes of paths, where paths with or without identity arrows are considered equivalent (and one makes only this identification), and associativity of paths is respected by this equivalence (e.g., \\((h\circ g)\circ (f\circ \mathrm{id}\_{c_0})\\) \\(=(h\circ g)\circ f=h\circ (g\circ f)\\) yields the same thing as \\((h\circ g)\circ (f\circ \mathrm{id}\_{ c_0})\\) \\(=h\circ (g\circ(f\circ\mathrm{id}\_{c_0}))\\) \\(=h\circ (g\circ f\\)). Edit: This can be seen as a consequence of the commutativity of a certain diagram corresponding to the equation: \\(\alpha\circ\sim=\sim\circ\alpha\\), where \\(\alpha\\) serves to switch the position of parentheses and \\(\sim\\) identifies paths differing only by identity arrows.`