It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

- All Categories 2.3K
- Chat 495
- Study Groups 6
- Biological Models 1
- Categorical Network Theory 1
- Programming with Categories 4
- Review Sections 6
- MIT 2020: Programming with Categories 53
- MIT 2020: Lectures 21
- MIT 2020: Exercises 25
- MIT 2019: Applied Category Theory 339
- MIT 2019: Lectures 79
- MIT 2019: Exercises 149
- MIT 2019: Chat 50
- UCR ACT Seminar 4
- General 64
- Azimuth Code Project 110
- Statistical methods 2
- Drafts 1
- Math Syntax Demos 15
- Wiki - Latest Changes 0
- Strategy 111
- Azimuth Project 1.1K
- - Spam 1
- News and Information 147
- Azimuth Blog 149
- - Conventions and Policies 21
- - Questions 43
- Azimuth Wiki 708

Options

## Comments

I appreciated seeing -- through the course videos -- that the concept of a functor is exactly what is

neededto define the meaning of a polymorphic datatype.And similarly the concept of a natural transformation is just what the doctor ordered for describing the meaning of a polymorphic function.

`I appreciated seeing -- through the course videos -- that the concept of a functor is exactly what is _needed_ to define the meaning of a polymorphic datatype. And similarly the concept of a natural transformation is just what the doctor ordered for describing the meaning of a polymorphic function.`

I appreciate this as a meaningful application of category theory. True, it's being applied to other theory, but that's still an application. And it is useful.

Category theory describes the semantics of Haskell programs, which can do empirically useful things. The theory can be used to prove the correctness of these programs. That's empirically useful!

`I appreciate this as a meaningful application of category theory. True, it's being applied to other theory, but that's still an application. And it is useful. Category theory describes the semantics of Haskell programs, which can do empirically useful things. The theory can be used to prove the correctness of these programs. That's empirically useful!`

I had an a-ha moment when they showed the intuition of Functors from trivial categories (like 1, 2, 3) to any category C and how they describe ways of picking objects and morphisms. :)

`I had an a-ha moment when they showed the intuition of Functors from trivial categories (like 1, 2, 3) to any category C and how they describe ways of picking objects and morphisms. :)`