It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

- All Categories 2.3K
- Chat 499
- Study Groups 17
- Petri Nets 8
- Epidemiology 3
- Leaf Modeling 1
- Review Sections 9
- MIT 2020: Programming with Categories 51
- MIT 2020: Lectures 20
- MIT 2020: Exercises 25
- MIT 2019: Applied Category Theory 339
- MIT 2019: Lectures 79
- MIT 2019: Exercises 149
- MIT 2019: Chat 50
- UCR ACT Seminar 4
- General 67
- Azimuth Code Project 110
- Statistical methods 3
- Drafts 2
- Math Syntax Demos 15
- Wiki - Latest Changes 3
- Strategy 113
- Azimuth Project 1.1K
- - Spam 1
- News and Information 147
- Azimuth Blog 149
- - Conventions and Policies 21
- - Questions 43
- Azimuth Wiki 707

Options

What kind of sorting does the mapping out of \(C \) to the walking isomorphism category define?

## Comments

Hi @JakeGillberg, can you give the background on what is C and is meant by the mapping out of it. I don’t have the notes at hand, but I’m guessing that the setup is something like this?

The walking isomorphism is defined by the diagram I that you gave. C is an arbitrary category. The mapping out of C is some functor F from C to I. So the problem is asking about what structure (sorting) is induced by F on C?

`Hi @JakeGillberg, can you give the background on what is C and is meant by the mapping out of it. I don’t have the notes at hand, but I’m guessing that the setup is something like this? The walking isomorphism is defined by the diagram I that you gave. C is an arbitrary category. The mapping out of C is some functor F from C to I. So the problem is asking about what structure (sorting) is induced by F on C?`

Yup, you got it! My intuition is that splitting Obj_C into any desired two (empty or non-empty) sets picks a functor F -> I, but I'm wondering if there is some structure I am not seeing.

`Yup, you got it! My intuition is that splitting Obj_C into any desired two (empty or non-empty) sets picks a functor F -> I, but I'm wondering if there is some structure I am not seeing.`