It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

- All Categories 2.3K
- Chat 496
- Study Groups 10
- Epidemiology 5
- Network Theory 2
- Leaf Modeling 1
- Review Sections 9
- MIT 2020: Programming with Categories 52
- MIT 2020: Lectures 21
- MIT 2020: Exercises 25
- MIT 2019: Applied Category Theory 339
- MIT 2019: Lectures 79
- MIT 2019: Exercises 149
- MIT 2019: Chat 50
- UCR ACT Seminar 4
- General 64
- Azimuth Code Project 110
- Statistical methods 2
- Drafts 1
- Math Syntax Demos 15
- Wiki - Latest Changes 2
- Strategy 111
- Azimuth Project 1.1K
- - Spam 1
- News and Information 147
- Azimuth Blog 149
- - Conventions and Policies 21
- - Questions 43
- Azimuth Wiki 707

Options

For each of the following statements about an object c, decide if it is equivalent to the statement “c is terminal”. If so, provide a proof, if not, find a category in which they are not.

The object c has a unique global element.

There exists another object d for which there is a unique generalized element of shape d in c.

For all objects d, there is a unique generalized element of each shape d in c

It seems 2 and 3 are straightforward, but 1 got me totally confused. To avoid spoilers - any hints to get started?

(To be clear - I am trying something out but got confused because what I currently have doesn't match my intuition)

## Comments

Guess my "intuition" should be called "baseless guessing" - turns out it's much easier to think about this using the category of sets and partial functions.

`Guess my "intuition" should be called "baseless guessing" - turns out it's much easier to think about this using the category of sets and partial functions.`