It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

- All Categories 2.4K
- Chat 505
- Study Groups 21
- Petri Nets 9
- Epidemiology 4
- Leaf Modeling 2
- Review Sections 9
- MIT 2020: Programming with Categories 51
- MIT 2020: Lectures 20
- MIT 2020: Exercises 25
- Baez ACT 2019: Online Course 339
- Baez ACT 2019: Lectures 79
- Baez ACT 2019: Exercises 149
- Baez ACT 2019: Chat 50
- UCR ACT Seminar 4
- General 75
- Azimuth Code Project 111
- Statistical methods 4
- Drafts 10
- Math Syntax Demos 15
- Wiki - Latest Changes 3
- Strategy 113
- Azimuth Project 1.1K
- - Spam 1
- News and Information 148
- Azimuth Blog 149
- - Conventions and Policies 21
- - Questions 43
- Azimuth Wiki 719

Options

## Comments

The two triangles indicate the fortnightly and monthly tropical (~sidereal) lunar cycles which could potentially reflect tidal forcing effects which conflate with the 27-day sun rotation cycle, as described here https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2008JD010499

Which is potentially bigger driver for triggering an earthquake? Tidal forcing or 2nd-order solar activity?

`> "As a final test, we wanted to check if the proton density catalogue is completely uncorrelated. We know, as stated above, that the seismic catalogue of strong earthquakes is non-Poissonian and internally correlated, so we have analyzed the proton density series to check if it were characterized by a white noise spectrum that would indicate an uncorrelated process. We simply computed the power spectrum, which is shown in Fig. 7 **(annotated below)**; it is clearly very different from a white spectrum, presenting at least two sharp peaks. We performed such a computation on the longest uninterrupted time window that has a 405 days length. This evidence testifies that neither the proton density distribution is random. So, this definitively confirms that the observed correlation between the seismic catalogue and the proton density cannot be likely obtained by chance; because the likelihood that two quantities, each of them internally correlated, show a clear mutual correlation only by chance is negligible." ![](https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img922/292/ORGmiM.png) The two triangles indicate the fortnightly and monthly tropical (~sidereal) lunar cycles which could potentially reflect tidal forcing effects which conflate with the 27-day sun rotation cycle, as described here https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2008JD010499 Which is potentially bigger driver for triggering an earthquake? Tidal forcing or 2nd-order solar activity?`