Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Categories
- All Categories 2.4K
- Chat 504
- Study Groups 21
- Petri Nets 9
- Epidemiology 4
- Leaf Modeling 2
- Review Sections 9
- MIT 2020: Programming with Categories 51
- MIT 2020: Lectures 20
- MIT 2020: Exercises 25
- Baez ACT 2019: Online Course 339
- Baez ACT 2019: Lectures 79
- Baez ACT 2019: Exercises 149
- Baez ACT 2019: Chat 50
- UCR ACT Seminar 4
- General 75
- Azimuth Code Project 111
- Statistical methods 4
- Drafts 10
- Math Syntax Demos 15
- Wiki - Latest Changes 3
- Strategy 113
- Azimuth Project 1.1K
- - Spam 1
- News and Information 148
- Azimuth Blog 149
- - Conventions and Policies 21
- - Questions 43
- Azimuth Wiki 718
Options
The context of the climate movie "Don't Look Up"
Anybody catch the subtext of the movie in that even though the scientists can accurately predict the trajectory of the comet as it hurls toward a collision with Earth, that they can't predict the occurrence of the next El Nino?
Apparently, we understand Newtonian physics when solids are involved but not when it comes to fluids.
Breakdown : trying to describe "how certain are the calculations", etc
Comments
Ridiculous paper accepted by AGU's Earth and Space Science journal
Small comets?
PubPeer review started here: https://pubpeer.com/publications/BD16A5F4127C2497E3FE7C753EE2D5
Ridiculous paper accepted by AGU's Earth and Space Science journal  Small comets? PubPeer review started here: https://pubpeer.com/publications/BD16A5F4127C2497E3FE7C753EE2D5