It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

- All Categories 2.2K
- Applied Category Theory Course 355
- Applied Category Theory Seminar 4
- Exercises 149
- Discussion Groups 49
- How to Use MathJax 15
- Chat 480
- Azimuth Code Project 108
- News and Information 145
- Azimuth Blog 149
- Azimuth Forum 29
- Azimuth Project 189
- - Strategy 108
- - Conventions and Policies 21
- - Questions 43
- Azimuth Wiki 711
- - Latest Changes 701
- - - Action 14
- - - Biodiversity 8
- - - Books 2
- - - Carbon 9
- - - Computational methods 38
- - - Climate 53
- - - Earth science 23
- - - Ecology 43
- - - Energy 29
- - - Experiments 30
- - - Geoengineering 0
- - - Mathematical methods 69
- - - Meta 9
- - - Methodology 16
- - - Natural resources 7
- - - Oceans 4
- - - Organizations 34
- - - People 6
- - - Publishing 4
- - - Reports 3
- - - Software 21
- - - Statistical methods 2
- - - Sustainability 4
- - - Things to do 2
- - - Visualisation 1
- General 39

Options

Created a stub on Julia.

## Comments

Neat! I saw a compared posting by William Sage where he compared R with recursion (known to be sloooooow) , Julia and the same fibonacci code in Cython and Julia is 400 times faster than R and compiled Sage is 4000 times faster than R .

steins post

But one of the Cython developers (a norwegian guy) also says that Cython and Julia should work together and his post is here

`Neat! I saw a compared posting by William Sage where he compared R with recursion (known to be sloooooow) , Julia and the same fibonacci code in Cython and Julia is 400 times faster than R and compiled Sage is 4000 times faster than R . [steins post](http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.sage.devel/58320) But one of the Cython developers (a norwegian guy) also says that Cython and Julia should work together and [his post is here](https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/julia-dev/YftOOEfcwrk)`