>The other point by nad is important, and that is whether we could actually pick up a pattern and predict the extrasystole peaks in the future.
As I said I think it looks biannual. Moreover in other comments I suspected that since it is so regular the biannuity seems to indicate a planetary origin, which alters the radiation (and thus the temperature) in a biannual fashion. I have though no idea what this planetary motion should be. One thing one should look at in the context of biannuity though more carefully is surely that the earth in its orbit around the sun appears with its axis a bit like a particle with a spin
(like around a nucleus). On the other hand if there would be some kind of biannuity in solar irradiance then this would probably be widely known.