John Baez wrote:
> Fong and Spivak try to remedy this by calling them posets, but that's gonna confuse everyone even more! If they wanted to save the day they should have made up a beautiful brand new term.
How about \\(apriorder \\)? :) Obviously leaning heavier on the Latin, and the idea of it being fundamental or 'from before'. Anyway, more to the point, for posts on the forum should we always consider poset to mean partially ordered set, and translate the terms from the book? From most contexts, it's probably pretty clear, but it is an unfortunate source of confusion.