> It doesn’t seem to me that “Azimuth” (whatever it is….) is always unanimous on all issues, in particular there are definitely messages on Azimuth G+ which I wouldn’t sign.

I agree with your sentiment about +Azimuth, not all messages on +Azimuth are always to my taste either.

But, well, we are a broad church, if I may quote someone from the blog.

Perhaps the easiest would be if Rasha followed the Forum, then we could discuss it further here (I once started a thread for this). But I think it already improved a lot. She is more selective than in the beginning and she quotes more carefully.

> So what is “the” Azimuth message?!

I did not intend to give such an impression of a unique message, so I'll rewrite my sentence more accurately:

> I think we want to draw more attention to the [particular] message [posted on a certain moment on +Azimuth] than to who actually posted [that particular message]

or shorter

> I think we want to draw more attention to the messages than to who actually posted them